-
Reform and Innovation Inspire Greater Vitality in Agricultural and Rural Development
Looking at the course of our country's agricultural development, every good situation and every step up has been driven by reform and innovation. Reform is the master key to solving the "three rural" issues. Since the 18th National Congress, the central leadership has attached great importance to agricultural and rural reform from an overall perspective, carried out top-level design,
-
Observations and Reflections on the "Hollowing Out" of Rural Collective Economies
Hard to Get Things Done Without Money, Services Can't Keep Up -- Observations on the "Hollowing Out" of Rural Collective Economies (Part One) Currently, the "hollowing out" of collective economies in some rural areas of western China has become the norm, affecting the development of village-level public welfare undertakings and the supply of public services. Yet China has not yet established a public finance system covering both urban and rural areas, and a large number of livelihood needs in rural areas still rely on the already weak village collective economies.
-
Revisiting the Issue of Rural Homestead Withdrawal
I. Introduction With the acceleration of urbanization, China's rural population has been migrating to cities and towns on a large scale, and the issue of rural homestead withdrawal has become increasingly prominent. Under the situation of conserving land use, topics such as the utilization of rural homesteads, the establishment of a homestead withdrawal mechanism, and the reform of the rural homestead system have been given considerable theoretical and practical significance. To summarize, there are mainly the following five points: First, the current rural residential land occupation scale is large and the utilization efficiency is low, causing a waste of land resources and being unfavorable to the protection of the red line of 1.8 billion mu of arable land. Second, industrialization and urbanization have brought about the paradox of a decrease in rural population and an increase in rural construction land, which is unfavorable to the intensive use of land and the improvement of farmers' lives. Third, the current homestead management system hinders the realization of the value of land factors and farmers' property rights, and is unfavorable to the objective requirements of coordinated urban-rural development and market-oriented resource allocation. Fourth, the establishment of a homestead withdrawal mechanism should have an economic and social foundation; the current social situation already has the economic and policy conditions, and the opportunity should be seized to carry out reform as soon as possible. Fifth, the establishment of a homestead withdrawal mechanism helps the urban transfer of rural population, accelerates the urbanization process, and promotes the efficient use of land resources. Regarding how to establish a homestead withdrawal mechanism, scholars mainly have the following three suggestions: First, establish a complete homestead use and transfer system to guarantee the realization of land asset value and curb the many problems caused by farmers' uncompensated land occupation. Second, improve the mechanisms for rural homestead exchange, consolidation, and reclamation, and guide farmers to withdraw from homesteads in an orderly manner through supporting policies and funds. Third, reform the rural homestead management system, liberalize the transfer of homestead use rights, protect farmers' property rights and interests, and improve farmers' living conditions.</p> <p> From the rural field surveys conducted by the author and the author's team in recent years, most of the above discussions on the issue of rural homestead utilization and the establishment of a homestead withdrawal mechanism are specious and inconsistent with the general rural situation that accounts for 95% of the total. The emergence of the current problem of rural homestead utilization is related not only to the rural land system, the urban-rural dual structure, and the imperfect social security system, but also to China's development strategy, economic structure, and population structure. Farmer mobility and household livelihood models are important factors affecting homestead withdrawal. Attributing problems such as hollow villages, multiple homesteads per household, small property-rights housing, and illegal homestead transfers to the lag of the legal system and the entanglement of the welfare nature of homesteads is not only far from the reality of the vast rural areas but also involves problems of argumentative logic. In view of this, the author attempts to respond from three aspects: the population mobility mechanism, the nature of rural homesteads, and rural homestead utilization; to discuss the causes and social harms of homestead problems in general rural areas; and to try to propose a long-term sustainable homestead withdrawal plan that does not require excessive resource input.</p> <p> II. The Connotation of Rural Homesteads and Their Utilization Efficiency</p> <p> 1. Local Knowledge and the Connotation of Homesteads</p> <p> At present, political and academic circles have not formed a unified understanding of the connotation of rural homesteads. Multiple legal documents have not clearly defined the connotation and extension of homesteads, and scholars classify and define rural homesteads according to different standards. From existing research, there are mainly four views on the definition of rural homesteads: First, rural homesteads are land used by farmer households to build residences, including housing, ancillary buildings, and courtyard land. Second, rural homesteads are residential land built by farmers, allocated by rural collective economic organizations and used by farmers on a long-term basis. Third, rural homesteads are land allocated by rural collective economic organizations to farmer households to guarantee their living needs, including housing sites, courtyards, ancillary housing (kitchens, warehouses, toilets), biogas pits, livestock and poultry sheds, and firewood stacks. Fourth, rural homesteads are non-cultivated vacant land in rural areas, including land with and without buildings. Academic disputes mainly focus on the following aspects: first, whether courtyards belong to homesteads; second, whether greening land in front of and behind houses belongs to homesteads; third, where the geographical boundary of a homestead with integrated house and land lies; fourth, what the relationship is between homesteads with houses, homesteads without houses, and planned homesteads.</p> <p> Chinese rural society varies greatly across regions, and popular understandings of rural homesteads differ considerably. This different understanding creates difficulties in statistically measuring the total amount of rural homesteads. In the rural areas of Jingmen City, Hubei Province, a homestead is land centered on housing occupation and extending over a large area around it. A standard homestead mainly consists of house occupation land, a grain-drying yard, a garden plot, a vegetable plot, and a pond, which has become a widely accepted "local knowledge" at both the township and village levels. Therefore, the homestead area in rural Jingmen City is relatively large, with 2-3 mu per household being very normal, and a small number of farmers' homestead areas even reaching 7-8 mu, mainly because the garden plots and grain-drying yards occupy a relatively large area. During the first and second national land resource surveys, surveyors used the locally consensual concept of homesteads as the measurement standard, which led to a statistical expansion of homestead area.</p> <p> In fact, in rural areas of central and western China, many places have relatively large homestead areas. For example, rural houses in Sichuan Province and Chongqing Municipality generally have a threshing floor in front and a woodlot behind, which farmers generally regard as part of the homestead, so the average homestead area per household is 2-3 mu. Moreover, in the eyes of many farmers, homesteads and arable land differ little in nature, and only land conducive to production and living has value. The classification of agricultural land, construction land, and unused land determined by the Land Administration Law of the People's Republic of China has little connection with farmers' real lives, and farmers do not care much about those abstract land rights.</p> <p> 2. Farmers' Subject Position and Homestead Utilization</p> <p> Farmers understand homesteads from the perspective of social function, which means that the relevant components of homesteads are important to farmers' production and living, and farmers will also change their understanding and utilization of homesteads with the changes of the times, so the utilization efficiency of rural homesteads is not low. For example, in some rural areas of Jingmen City, with technological progress and industrial development, the function of ponds has been shrinking, and some ponds have even been abandoned, so farmers no longer regard ponds as part of homesteads. The problem is that academia has generally formed a consensus that the amount of idle rural homesteads is large, that ancillary land such as grain-drying yards, garden plots, and ponds is used extensively, and that utilization efficiency is low. For example, Wang Xudong's statistics show that from 1997 to 2008, the rural population decreased by 14%, while village land increased by about 4%, showing a reverse trend of people decreasing and land increasing. The total land use per rural household exceeded 1 mu, and the per capita residential land use reached as high as 229 square meters, far higher than the stipulated 150 square meters. Starting from the large scale, low utilization rate, and scattered, disorderly, and empty phenomena of rural residential land, scholars have concluded that rural land resources are seriously wasted and that the potential for rural land consolidation is huge, and therefore suggestions to carry out land consolidation through the policy of linking increases and decreases in urban and rural construction land and the urban-rural coordination policy have become widely popular.</p> <p> In this regard, the author will not for the time being comment on whether the measurement and estimation logic of rural residential land is scientific under the background of an uncertain concept of homesteads, but will only explain the state of homestead utilization efficiency from the perspective of rural homestead utilization under macro-structural constraints. At present, there are different versions of China's farmer population, with commonly seen figures of over 700 million, over 800 million, and over 900 million. The author agrees with He Xuefeng's judgment that China's current rural population is about 880 million. On the premise of China's sustained and rapid economic development, even if the pace of population urbanization increases to 50% in the next 50 years, rural areas will still have 700-800 million people. In other words, for a considerable period in the future, most farmers will still find it difficult to settle in cities and will still have to move back and forth between urban and rural areas like migratory birds. The non-withdrawal of rural homesteads is closely related to the instability of farmers' migrant work income and the irreplaceability of the production function of homesteads. Examined from the perspective of farmers' subject position, it can be found that rural homestead utilization is reasonable, and the waste of land resources is merely a superficial understanding from the top down.</p> <p> Farmers' income mainly comes from two parts: first, going out to work, and second, farming at home. On the one hand, China's economic structure and its position in the international system determine that most farmers who enter cities earn meager wages from work and find it difficult to complete the urban reproduction of their labor power. Moreover, with the rapid advancement of urbanization and industrialization, a large number of farmers have poured into cities, making the labor market oversupplied, and the income space of urban migrant workers has been further compressed. On the other hand, under the resource constraints of a large population and little land and the background of economic globalization, the situation of agricultural growth without income growth has long existed. As a result, agricultural income and migrant work income together support the livelihood of small farmer households, and neither can be missing. Under the above macro-structural constraints, rural homesteads must not only assume the living function of providing shelter for residents and the production function of guaranteeing agricultural income, but also assume the social security function of coping with market risks.</p> <p> In order to better obtain family development funds, under normal circumstances, the elderly farm in the village to support themselves, while young people go out to earn money to support their small families. This has to some extent caused idle homesteads. Affected by farmers' urban employment, some homesteads remain idle for a long time, while others remain idle for a shorter time, and cases of homesteads being permanently abandoned are not common. Therefore, the floor area ratio of 0.268 per household calculated by some scholars from the perspective of village spatial form, used to show that rural homestead use efficiency is low, does not conform to the actual situation of rural homestead utilization. Homestead use efficiency should be considered from the perspective of small farmer household livelihoods and approached from the role of social security. Discussing homestead use efficiency based on residential occupancy, without considering the small farmer household livelihood model and without considering farmers' mobility mechanisms, does not conform to rural social reality.<br /> <br />
-
How can rural local talent be cultivated and developed?
In the vast rural areas, there is an active group of such local experts and "field scholars"; they are local talent who have long struggled in all walks of life and on all fronts in rural areas, and they exert a strong influence and exemplary role on the younger generation in rural areas. Comprehensively strengthen the training of rural youth
-
Coarse grains move online for sale: Ministry of Commerce encourages e-commerce in rural areas to alleviate poverty
Yesterday (September 7), Ministry of Commerce spokesperson Shen Danyang said at a press conference that the Ministry of Commerce will adopt ten specific measures to promote rural e-commerce. A few days ago, the Ministry of Commerce and 19 other departments issued the "Opinions on Accelerating the Development of Rural E-Commerce," Shen Danyang
-
What is the relationship between farmland system innovation and rural economic development? Lu Fuxing explains in detail
In theory, China's current rural land system belongs to a system of separation of the two rights of land, and in essence it is quasi-state ownership. With the rapid development of the economy and society, calls for innovation in the farmland system are growing stronger. Only by accelerating innovation in the farmland system and clarifying farmland property
-
Ecological civilization construction must not leave rural areas cold while cities stay hot
"Ecology is life, the environment is people's livelihood, green mountains are beauty, and blue skies are also happiness; protecting the ecological environment is protecting productivity, and improving the ecological environment is developing productivity. Building ecological civilization concerns the well-being of the people and the future of the nation." Xi Jin
-
Elderly Agriculture: The Semi-Farming Model of Left-Behind Elderly in Rural Areas
Convenient mechanical tillage and farmland management are the intrinsic needs of elderly agriculture. At present, the vast majority of rural areas across the country have already formed a household livelihood model of "semi-work and semi-farming based on intergenerational division of labor." This household livelihood model is called the labor force reproduction model or family reproduction
-
Agricultural Bank of China Allocates 380 Billion Yuan to the Agriculture, Rural Areas and Farmers Sector
Agricultural Bank of China recently released its 2015 interim report. The report shows that in the first half of this year, the bank made serving agriculture, rural areas and farmers its strategic priority, focusing on financial services in key areas such as new types of agricultural business entities, water conservancy and urbanisation, with county-level loans increasing by 161.8 billion yuan. Ag
-
Urbanization must not be turned into uniformity between urban and rural areas
Urbanization is a natural historical process. In regions at different stages of development and with different development conditions, the orientation, content and priorities of urbanization all differ. China is a large developing country with a huge population and a vast territory, and the levels of economic development and the conditions for urbanization vary greatly from place to place, so advancing urbanization should have different emphases and breakthrough directions in different regions. Comrade Xi Jinping pointed out at the ninth meeting of the Central Leading Group for Financial and Economic Affairs that "advancing urbanization is not about turning urban and rural areas into uniformity." However, some places, disregarding their own conditions, blindly copy others, and disregarding economic laws, rush headlong into action, giving rise to chaos such as relocating villages and merging towns, building houses to create cities, and forcing farmers to move into urban buildings. This must be taken very seriously and resolutely corrected.
条件筛选