Microecological products in China are a mixed bag; please share your experience honestly and factually.
Microecology in China is currently a mixed bag; please share your experience honestly and factually.
There are many microecology companies in China, but several hundred sprang up in a short time. Because domestic testing methods are backward, many manufacturers only discovered they had been cheated after using the products. I invite colleagues here to honestly and factually evaluate, based on their own experience, the companies they have dealt with. If it is speculation or advertising, please do not come. Thank you.
--------------------------------------
I will first talk about my own experience. The companies our company has dealt with are as follows: Kangdien, Angel Yeast, Shandong Yishengyuan, and a company in Guangdong, seems to be called something Mu, I forget the full name. We analyzed and tested products from several companies and did breeding trials. In terms of bacterial content, the companies were all about the same, but in terms of actual results, Shandong Yishengyuan was somewhat better. For weight gain at slaughter, Kangdien and Yishengyuan were about the same, but for mortality and culling rate, probiotics was much lower, about 20% lower. Later we also used this company's products on a large scale. Their value-added services were also quite good; besides the products, they also helped me solve some other problems.
--------------------------------------
Haha, a shill for Zhonghui company, right? Who does not know that the several people doing R&D at Yishengyuan took bacterial strains from Kangdien when they left? Could they really be better than Kangdien?
--------------------------------------
I work in R&D at Yishengyuan. Our current strains come from our own isolation and from purchases from official state departments. Do not use past views to judge the current situation several years later. Kangdien indeed does well, but we cannot deny Yishengyuan's rapid development.
--------------------------------------
Hubei Lvtiandi Biotechnology Co., Ltd., all the main technical personnel come from the College of Life Science and Technology at Huazhong Agricultural University, gathering a group of top domestic breeding and fermentation experts, all liquid-fermented high-content, high-purity strains.
--------------------------------------
Without good testing methods, it is impossible to produce good products.
$ @4 n6 l/ O- r4 s
" w7 |+ S/ e, k: r& r# Blinlin added the following content on 2009-11-23 16:472 Go8 E( H: _1 g8 _1 S0 l' S# V: m
$ I# qG( T) g2 P- f
Without good testing methods, it is impossible to produce good products.
--------------------------------------
They are all good things, but no matter how good the products are, effort still has to be put into promotion. Who has steadily built a few model breeding bases to drive the market?
--------------------------------------
May I ask, which microecology manufacturers are more promising for future development? What are the reasons?
--------------------------------------
I produce my own compound bacteria and use them for my own farming. I have compared the products of the various manufacturers above; each has its own characteristics and each has its own shortcomings. In short, the effect of dry bacteria is indeed somewhat worse than liquid compound bacteria, but liquid ones require more attention to usage methods and techniques. Many products are not bad, but people do not know how to use them, and even the producers do not know how to use them to bring out the product's maximum performance, so using them still requires careful exploration. For producers, getting the product made is only the first step in a long march.
--------------------------------------
I will first talk about my own experience. The companies our company has dealt with are as follows: Kangdien, Angel Yeast, Shandong Yishengyuan, and a company in Guangdong, seems to be called something Mu, I forget the full name. We analyzed and tested products from several companies and did breeding trials. In terms of bacterial content, the companies were all about the same, but in terms of actual results, Shandong Yishengyuan was somewhat better. For weight gain at slaughter, Kangdien and Yishengyuan were about the same, but for mortality and culling rate, probiotics was much lower, about 20% lower. Later we also used this company's products on a large scale. Their value-added services were also quite good; besides the products, they also helped me solve some other problems.
--------------------------------------
Haha, a shill for Zhonghui company, right? Who does not know that the several people doing R&D at Yishengyuan took bacterial strains from Kangdien when they left? Could they really be better than Kangdien?
--------------------------------------
I work in R&D at Yishengyuan. Our current strains come from our own isolation and from purchases from official state departments. Do not use past views to judge the current situation several years later. Kangdien indeed does well, but we cannot deny Yishengyuan's rapid development.
--------------------------------------
Hubei Lvtiandi Biotechnology Co., Ltd., all the main technical personnel come from the College of Life Science and Technology at Huazhong Agricultural University, gathering a group of top domestic breeding and fermentation experts, all liquid-fermented high-content, high-purity strains.
--------------------------------------
Without good testing methods, it is impossible to produce good products.
$ @4 n6 l/ O- r4 s
" w7 |+ S/ e, k: r& r# Blinlin added the following content on 2009-11-23 16:472 Go8 E( H: _1 g8 _1 S0 l' S# V: m
$ I# qG( T) g2 P- f
Without good testing methods, it is impossible to produce good products.
--------------------------------------
They are all good things, but no matter how good the products are, effort still has to be put into promotion. Who has steadily built a few model breeding bases to drive the market?
--------------------------------------
May I ask, which microecology manufacturers are more promising for future development? What are the reasons?
--------------------------------------
I produce my own compound bacteria and use them for my own farming. I have compared the products of the various manufacturers above; each has its own characteristics and each has its own shortcomings. In short, the effect of dry bacteria is indeed somewhat worse than liquid compound bacteria, but liquid ones require more attention to usage methods and techniques. Many products are not bad, but people do not know how to use them, and even the producers do not know how to use them to bring out the product's maximum performance, so using them still requires careful exploration. For producers, getting the product made is only the first step in a long march.