How to tell good feed from bad? Methods for choosing good feed
What kind of feed is good feed
1. High-quality feed is not necessarily good feed
Today the quality is very high, but it cannot always stay at a high level. Especially when the raw material market changes, it is very difficult to keep product quality high. Once there is any fluctuation, users say your product quality is poor; even though your product quality is still better than others, users think your product quality is simply no good.
2. Low-quality feed is definitely not good feed
If quality is low, it cannot bring good economic benefits to users and farmers, and it will certainly be eliminated.
3. Feed that is always stable is good feed
Stable quality, whether at the high end or the mid-range, makes a product that users consider reliable.
--------------------------------------
I support the original poster's view.
But it is not easy to achieve this. I wonder how you keep quality stable?
--------------------------------------
Feed that helps farmers make money is good feed.
--------------------------------------
Stable quality, whether at the high end or the mid-range, makes a product that users consider reliable.
--------------------------------------
Well said.....
--------------------------------------
Farmers can make more money.
--------------------------------------
The profit margin on feed is very thin.......
--------------------------------------
Details determine quality. I think the stability of product quality lies in the details of company management.
--------------------------------------
Yes, feed that enables farmers to make money is good feed!
--------------------------------------
If I were a farmer, besides requiring stable feed quality, I would also look at whether certain products from the company have an inhibitory effect on the so-called epidemic diseases currently appearing, and in addition, for the pigs, chickens, cattle, etc. I raise, what kind of services the manufacturer can provide so that the things I raise get sick less or do not get sick. In this way, the costs invested are relatively lower, and the profits are correspondingly higher.
--------------------------------------
I support the original poster's view.
--------------------------------------
Perhaps because I have more contact with foreign-funded enterprises, I have found that their quality philosophy does not mean providing you with how high, how very high product quality, but rather always maintaining very stable quality. Coupled with their unique after-sales service, although product prices are very high, sales are still quite good, especially when the prices of meat, eggs, and milk are high.
Today the quality is very high, but it cannot always stay at a high level. Especially when the raw material market changes, it is very difficult to keep product quality high. Once there is any fluctuation, users say your product quality is poor; even though your product quality is still better than others, users think your product quality is simply no good.
2. Low-quality feed is definitely not good feed
If quality is low, it cannot bring good economic benefits to users and farmers, and it will certainly be eliminated.
3. Feed that is always stable is good feed
Stable quality, whether at the high end or the mid-range, makes a product that users consider reliable.
--------------------------------------
I support the original poster's view.
But it is not easy to achieve this. I wonder how you keep quality stable?
--------------------------------------
Feed that helps farmers make money is good feed.
--------------------------------------
Stable quality, whether at the high end or the mid-range, makes a product that users consider reliable.
--------------------------------------
Well said.....
--------------------------------------
Farmers can make more money.
--------------------------------------
The profit margin on feed is very thin.......
--------------------------------------
Details determine quality. I think the stability of product quality lies in the details of company management.
--------------------------------------
Yes, feed that enables farmers to make money is good feed!
--------------------------------------
If I were a farmer, besides requiring stable feed quality, I would also look at whether certain products from the company have an inhibitory effect on the so-called epidemic diseases currently appearing, and in addition, for the pigs, chickens, cattle, etc. I raise, what kind of services the manufacturer can provide so that the things I raise get sick less or do not get sick. In this way, the costs invested are relatively lower, and the profits are correspondingly higher.
--------------------------------------
I support the original poster's view.
--------------------------------------
Perhaps because I have more contact with foreign-funded enterprises, I have found that their quality philosophy does not mean providing you with how high, how very high product quality, but rather always maintaining very stable quality. Coupled with their unique after-sales service, although product prices are very high, sales are still quite good, especially when the prices of meat, eggs, and milk are high.