Why is the quality control department's veto power nothing but an empty shell?
Where has the quality control department's veto power gone?
Many feed companies publicly claim that the quality control department has veto power over the quality of the company's raw materials and products, but the number that actually have veto power and actually exercise it is pitifully small. So where has that veto power gone? Everyone is welcome to share their views!
--------------------------------------
Quality control is not easy to do, but you still have to do it with care!
--------------------------------------
It is impossible for the quality control department to have such great power, especially in small and medium-sized units!! Under normal circumstances the quality control department has decision-making power, but in special situations the boss still has the final say on internal quality! If the boss says the raw material should be accepted, what is the point of the quality control department stubbornly insisting? You can only present the quality situation in writing to the boss and let him consider it comprehensively. After all, the quality control department can only start from the angle of quality, while the boss thinks differently and has to consider the company's overall interests!!
Of course, sometimes quality control staff painstakingly single out nonconforming products, putting in the effort and getting cursed at by suppliers too. If at this point the supplier goes to the boss and the boss says one word, "accept it," that really makes quality control staff furious!! As quality control staff, I think many friends may have been through similar situations. Angry as you are, you can only adjust your own mood.
--------------------------------------
Reply to 3#Crude protein
[ts]xuridongshengyx added the following content on 2009-11-21 20:48[/ts]
The frustrations of those of us doing quality control!!!
--------------------------------------
The quality control department has veto power over the quality of the company's raw materials and products, but in some small and medium-sized companies it may face challenges.
--------------------------------------
I quite agree with Sister Cu's opinion. Supporting Brother Zhou.
--------------------------------------
Our company's quality control department has also had this kind of problem, but the vast majority were within the range of not affecting product quality and accepting with concessions. Barely used.
--------------------------------------
Reality is reality. We have to both insist and be lenient; there is no other way.
--------------------------------------
Personal view: the quality control department is also part of the company and must also be responsible for the company's operating conditions. On one hand, it ensures quality does not have major problems (even if you could replace all raw materials with the best ones, small problems cannot be 100% avoided, and you cannot say your sales volume will be number one in the whole province). On the other hand, it also has to consider comprehensively: when supply is tight, when there is no material and production has to stop, when raw material prices rise sharply, it is impossible to just say "stick to principles" and ignore other departments, right? In addition, if a supplier can also sell a considerable amount of products for the company, or if a supplier can bring other benefits to the company (such as a network of connections), you also cannot just say "stick to principles" and keep people at a thousand miles' distance, right? But the general manager has to understand the whole matter. Generally speaking, the boss will not casually tell us to relax inspection standards. If we look at things more openly and stand a bit higher, our hearts will not feel so wronged. The most important thing is still to find a balance.
--------------------------------------
It is all a balancing relationship; you just have to grasp the balance point.
--------------------------------------
With the power to veto, it is easy to offend people.
Without the power to veto, it does not work well either.
--------------------------------------
A former leader once said, "First-class raw materials producing first-class products is inevitable; second-class raw materials producing first-class products is our goal." The meaning is that raw materials do not need to be the best and most expensive, only qualified. I wonder if this statement is correct?
--------------------------------------
Quality control is not easy to do, but you still have to do it with care!
--------------------------------------
It is impossible for the quality control department to have such great power, especially in small and medium-sized units!! Under normal circumstances the quality control department has decision-making power, but in special situations the boss still has the final say on internal quality! If the boss says the raw material should be accepted, what is the point of the quality control department stubbornly insisting? You can only present the quality situation in writing to the boss and let him consider it comprehensively. After all, the quality control department can only start from the angle of quality, while the boss thinks differently and has to consider the company's overall interests!!
Of course, sometimes quality control staff painstakingly single out nonconforming products, putting in the effort and getting cursed at by suppliers too. If at this point the supplier goes to the boss and the boss says one word, "accept it," that really makes quality control staff furious!! As quality control staff, I think many friends may have been through similar situations. Angry as you are, you can only adjust your own mood.
--------------------------------------
Reply to 3#Crude protein
[ts]xuridongshengyx added the following content on 2009-11-21 20:48[/ts]
The frustrations of those of us doing quality control!!!
--------------------------------------
The quality control department has veto power over the quality of the company's raw materials and products, but in some small and medium-sized companies it may face challenges.
--------------------------------------
I quite agree with Sister Cu's opinion. Supporting Brother Zhou.
--------------------------------------
Our company's quality control department has also had this kind of problem, but the vast majority were within the range of not affecting product quality and accepting with concessions. Barely used.
--------------------------------------
Reality is reality. We have to both insist and be lenient; there is no other way.
--------------------------------------
Personal view: the quality control department is also part of the company and must also be responsible for the company's operating conditions. On one hand, it ensures quality does not have major problems (even if you could replace all raw materials with the best ones, small problems cannot be 100% avoided, and you cannot say your sales volume will be number one in the whole province). On the other hand, it also has to consider comprehensively: when supply is tight, when there is no material and production has to stop, when raw material prices rise sharply, it is impossible to just say "stick to principles" and ignore other departments, right? In addition, if a supplier can also sell a considerable amount of products for the company, or if a supplier can bring other benefits to the company (such as a network of connections), you also cannot just say "stick to principles" and keep people at a thousand miles' distance, right? But the general manager has to understand the whole matter. Generally speaking, the boss will not casually tell us to relax inspection standards. If we look at things more openly and stand a bit higher, our hearts will not feel so wronged. The most important thing is still to find a balance.
--------------------------------------
It is all a balancing relationship; you just have to grasp the balance point.
--------------------------------------
With the power to veto, it is easy to offend people.
Without the power to veto, it does not work well either.
--------------------------------------
A former leader once said, "First-class raw materials producing first-class products is inevitable; second-class raw materials producing first-class products is our goal." The meaning is that raw materials do not need to be the best and most expensive, only qualified. I wonder if this statement is correct?