Why is the current situation of workers in feed enterprises so puzzling?
The current situation of workers in feed enterprises, puzzling???
For some small and medium-sized feed enterprises, staff turnover is very high, and the most headache-inducing problem for the managers of these enterprises is personnel. Without people, all management is empty talk. And I have found that our enterprise is the same: the biggest problem is low pay, but the organization is bloated. One job is split between two people, and the pay for each person is not high, and work efficiency is not high either. What puzzles me is why the company cannot let one person do the job and pay that person one and a half people's wages? These past two days I asked workers in several positions: if they were asked to do two people's work and were given XXX wages, how would that be? They all said they could do it just the same, and absolutely could do it fast and well. I think this could also solve the problem of feed mills having difficulty recruiting people, and efficiency would improve too. But it is impossible that the company is not aware of this, right? And why does it not do it? I cannot figure it out no matter how hard I try. I ask all you experts for advice????
daguang315 added the following content on 2009-12-10 10:06
Taking the sofa for myself, could it be related to family ownership???
---------------------
Hehe~~~~~~~~~~~
---------------------
It is probably a mechanism issue. Our popularity this year is really strong. Workers earn two thousand to three thousand per month, and many employees who left before all want to come back.
---------------------
It is still inadequate management. The company has not carefully reviewed the workload of its personnel, and there is no self-check management mechanism.
---------------------
Hehe, it is a mechanism issue, but human desire is endless.
---------------------
It is an overall management problem! From the internal mechanism to external market recognition, the overall operating benefit is all closely linked! Product quality determines market influence, marketing intensity determines market share, sales determine output, and output affects benefit. There is a story in every aspect.
---------------------
Set the work system well, quantify duties, and make responsibilities clear!
---------------------
Workers all want to earn a bit more money, so as long as it does not exceed people's endurance, reducing the number of people and improving work efficiency is advocated.
---------------------
This is a question worth deep thought. The main reason is, what if this one person takes leave or quits? How can the company immediately get someone?
---------------------
Link products with performance.
Workers also get commissions; carve out a piece of the cake for them.
In this way, workers are also reduced and efficiency will also improve.
---------------------
I am worrying about personnel right now.
---------------------
Do you know why workers go out to work? Put yourself in their shoes. If you were them, would you come?
daguang315 added the following content on 2009-12-10 10:06
Taking the sofa for myself, could it be related to family ownership???
---------------------
Hehe~~~~~~~~~~~
---------------------
It is probably a mechanism issue. Our popularity this year is really strong. Workers earn two thousand to three thousand per month, and many employees who left before all want to come back.
---------------------
It is still inadequate management. The company has not carefully reviewed the workload of its personnel, and there is no self-check management mechanism.
---------------------
Hehe, it is a mechanism issue, but human desire is endless.
---------------------
It is an overall management problem! From the internal mechanism to external market recognition, the overall operating benefit is all closely linked! Product quality determines market influence, marketing intensity determines market share, sales determine output, and output affects benefit. There is a story in every aspect.
---------------------
Set the work system well, quantify duties, and make responsibilities clear!
---------------------
Workers all want to earn a bit more money, so as long as it does not exceed people's endurance, reducing the number of people and improving work efficiency is advocated.
---------------------
This is a question worth deep thought. The main reason is, what if this one person takes leave or quits? How can the company immediately get someone?
---------------------
Link products with performance.
Workers also get commissions; carve out a piece of the cake for them.
In this way, workers are also reduced and efficiency will also improve.
---------------------
I am worrying about personnel right now.
---------------------
Do you know why workers go out to work? Put yourself in their shoes. If you were them, would you come?