The gold, silver, and bronze awards of the rose world - after seeing them, do you agree or not?

Usually when we go to flower shows, they are all about orchids, or some bonsai and the like. You may not know that roses also have their own shows, and they even give out gold, silver, and bronze awards. Come and see whether you agree or not.

As for the judging of the rose gold, silver, and bronze awards, perhaps every rose grower has their own opinion, thinking that none of the gold, silver, or bronze award roses are as good as the roses they grow themselves. Today Huahua will share her own judgment on which roses deserve the gold, silver, and bronze awards.

First of all, they must bloom abundantly and bloom large. Cut rose Juliet, Blue Storm, Queen of Sweden, Misaki, French Monet, Archangel Gabriel, Pink Dragon Sand Gem, and Heart's Drop are all good choices.

Secondly, they should be a bit easier to grow. Otherwise, ordinary rose growers cannot keep them alive at all. No matter how prestigious the gold, silver, or bronze award is, it is useless. Beautiful flowers can only be glanced at from afar, and rose growers are not very enthusiastic about them either. Roses of the Lady of Shalott type have strong disease resistance, bloom in all four seasons, have a compact plant shape, are more suitable for pot cultivation, and are easy to grow. Medium fruity fragrance, repeat blooming in multiple seasons, good disease resistance, a classic variety with a medium flower shape.

The price is relatively affordable. Some rose growers may disagree. To win the gold, silver, or bronze award, if the price is too cheap, it will seem inexpensive, so how could it still win an award? But Huahua thinks that for roses that are beautiful and affordable, should they be disliked just because they are cheap?